Google Search Plus Your World: Crowdsourcing Masterclass

Lots of interesting information is being banded about regarding Google’s new “search plus your world” service, a deeply integrated mix of Google+ recommendations and natural search results.

There’s enough information on the change and its short term effects on the search user experience, ranging from: Search plus your world is Good (rare), all the way to: Search plus your world is the Devil and will come round your house with Jeremy Clarkson and shoot you in front of your family. In the face.

The most obvious being that the higher Google+’s uptake, the more people will be logged in when searching and the more frightening the curse of (not provided) becomes.  Secondly, of course is that PPC position #4+ are made increasingly less useful.

I wont be covering that here, there are many, many opinions around that. What I’m interested in, is that this heralds yet another power play from Google, with repercussions that echo for once, beyond the search industry.

Rule With a Carrot-Shaped Stick

Google hasn’t had anything like the traction they wanted from Google+ and so has resorted to something very similar to the ICO on the cookie regulations – Rather than take direct responsibility for consumer education/acquisition, just force webmasters to market your products for you. Easy.

As set out by Danny Sullivan, any smart marketer can clearly see that a compelling Google+ presence will at least create:

[list type=”check”]

  • Extra visibility in the real estate previously saved for Adwords positions 4-10
  • More Meta content and eye candy in the snippet/ relationship bumph
  • Visibility in personalised content recommendations from known people

[/list]

 

With Google augmenting results with rich information like this, the CTR improvements that a webmaster can expect from SERPs could be huge if they can leverage a large Google+ network. This, of course, seriously incentivises the use of onsite +1 buttons and increased activity on the network itself.

This move essentially crowdsources promotion of Google+ across the millions of webmasters who care about their exposure on the search results page.

So instead of publishers, merchants and webmasters taking the traditional view of adapting and targeting their marketing based on what the market is requesting, in fact, to compete for these high-profile SERP augmentations one needs to force users through a hoop route prescribed by Google; That is, Google+.

Of course, you could just up your Adwords bids (cough, profiteering much?).

Just take a second to re-read that. You, as a business, don’t need to be on Google+. It doesn’t have the penetration of Facebook, it’s not as creative or controllable an experience as your own web property – YET, you are missing out on the equivalent of a #4 adwords bid and some shiny rich snippets by not doing so.

From the other perspective you, as a user, don’t need to be on Google+ as well as Facebook, Twitter etc. I’d wager that until all of your mates are on it, it’s relatively useless.

[blockquote cite=””]So the fact remains, to compete for exceptional levels of favouritism, a business needs to push users, content and otherwise direct brand engagment onto Google+. What a stinker.

Or should I say masterstroke? – Tweet this post[/blockquote]

Thomas Cook SEO Domains for sale on eBay!

Someone’s put what looks like a bit of a haul available on eBay – allegedly they’re from some of Thomas Cook’s SEO efforts, a batch of 142 domains, some with decent content and well linked to, some not worth a fiver.

I’ve run a few reports to help you make the decision as to whether they’re worth the £18k buy it now! An excel sheet showing the ACRank, external links, external linking domains, unique IPS and more for each domain.

[paywithtweet id=”1″ text=”Click here to download the xls comparison for FREE – you just have to tweet this post!”]

This image gives a good idea of the neighbourhood of the domains, one of the more common link sources being doweb.co.uk, lovely looking site.

[lightbox group=”album” title=”Clique graph – Click for full size” link=”http://colewhitelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/cliquehunter.png”][/lightbox]

Lead image credit: steakpinball

2 Reasons Your Keywords Suck

[info]This is the first part of a general keyword research tips series where I’ll be handing over the tools and insight to develop a sound keyword, and ultimately, SEO strategy.[/info]

I’ve won several clients from their incumbent agencies and it never ceases to amaze me how little effort has gone into that initial research into a client’s market – we’re talking about deciding on the direction in which you are facing your entire SEO or inbound marketing efforts (and money!).

Keyword Research is a Strategic Bedrock

It’s so common to see keyword research methods that just don’t cut it. I’ve seen some really awful examples; ranging from a simple dump from Google’s keyword tool with some charts to literally a list of 10 words from Wordtracker Free.
[warning]
Keyword research is an absolutely critical starting point for any online marketing strategy.

Poor choices here can lead to a year-long slog for peanuts in ROI because you chose phrases that are too tough for your current link profile; or a laundry list of vanity #1 rankings which have no demand and make no sales.

[/warning]
What you call things in your business is very rarely what searchers use to find you. I have countless examples of a detailed keyword analysis uncovering rich veins of niche demand – or even new product ideas and branding direction. That’s without mentioning its obvious effect on domain use/choice, URL structures, navigation items, section titles and content strategy.

Experienced analysis of the search demand in your market is invaluable – If all you need is a completely unqualified list of keywords that might be related to your site or business then there really is no need to pay someone hundreds of pounds to tell you that – just go here for free (Google Keyword Tool) or here with your credit card (Wordtracker).

Anyway, onto those reasons:

#1 – Using only one source for suggestions but many for estimation

There really is no rigid rule for collecting keyword ideas – different sources have completely different methods for collecting them. This is one case where I’d happily allow people to add apples to the pear basket.

The more sources for ideas, colloquialisms and potential niches, the better – In addition to the two obvious tools I mentioned above how about the list below to get your right-brain thinking of creative areas for inspiration (click to see all details)?
[the_accordion]

[accordion title=”Amazon Top Searches”]A fantastic list of all the current most popular searches, you can even filter by department..[/accordion]

[accordion title=”Waterstones Non-fiction Bestsellers”]Waterstone’s non-fiction bestsellers
Best-selling books in your industry are a great way to get you thinking about alternative names for your products or services.[/accordion]

[accordion title=”Yahoo Answers”]Yahoo AnswersGood post here – but essentially just search for your topic and see how people are using it, what they’re asking for – also useful for new content ideas.[/accordion]

[accordion title=”Rob’s Awesome Google Suggest Tool”]Rob’s Awesome Google Suggest Tool – great tool here from distilled’s Rob Millard (@rob_millard) to expand your keywords using Google Suggest.[/accordion]

[accordion title=”Wordtracker’s Keyword Questions”]Wordtracker’s Keyword Questions are accessible through their free account – this has some excellent examples to “loosen up” your keyword language and vary the terms you find.[/accordion]

[accordion title=”Tilde Google Searches”]Tilde Google Searches – Set Google to display 100 results (or install Autopagerize) and search Google for: intitle:~your keyword search – this shows a great range of terms that Google is explicitly telling you it considers related – take the hint!
[/accordion]
[/the_accordion]

Once you’ve mined a (preferably huge) list of keyword ideas, then is the time when you must compare like for like – do not use wordtracker and Google for subsets of your data and try to compare them! Just choose one of the leading traffic estimation tools and stick with it – whether the absolute values are spot on is largely irrelevant, it’s just really important that they are being compared relatively.

#2 Ignoring your current site authority

Secondly, if had a pound for every person who just wants to rank for the head term in their industry, I’d have a really cool private jet by now. How much traffic and how many quality links do you already have? I would wager that it’s highly unlikely you can hit the big traffic terms immediately and to do so would be disastrous for your understanding of how effective SEO can be in growing a business.

Heading after the top competition terms may not see any results for many months, even years. Your keyword research should always find a way to distinguish relative difficulty to rank. That way you can easily identify immediate areas to focus on (using on-page SEO to rank for some niche terms for example) and the longer term “trunks” that are contained within that will require more links and authority to start getting any traffic.

For example if you’re in the purple headband business that’s your big money term but it’s super competitive. Based on your current link profile (or PageRank/MozRank/ACRank for quick-and-dirty check) our short term goals may need to terms like “great value purple headband”, “washable purple headband” etc. All of these terms are in the same semantic neighborhood as the high competition term and will be helping you appear relevant for it over the long term but will deliver profitable, converting traffic in the meantime.

Don’t Forget the Salt

It’s worth noting that all these tools have a limited section of the internet on which to base their numbers – I talk about relative search volumes, relative keyword difficulty as that’s all you can really do until you have real data. Once you can accurately map your traffic gains to keyword trunks and themes you’ll only need those volume tools to priorities new targets.

Final Thought

Think of keyword research as the heading or intended course of an aircraft. Ongoing analysis is basically the autopilot, 90% of the time a plane isn’t flying on the true heading, the autopilot is making hundreds of minute adjustments every second to keep the plane on course – remind you of anything?

The next part of this post is coming early next week and goes into a bit more detail on how you might asses your site’s strength and match it to keyword targets.
[info]
I love to share simple, actionable advice so if you think this’d be useful for someone in your social sphere, please share it with the links below, it only takes a second.
[/info]

Proof: Content spamming with javascript works

It would seem that things are tough at the top.  Of course I mean the top of the SERPs for terms like ‘SEO’, ‘Search engine optimis(z)ation’ and the like.  This is a seriously competitive space for vanity rankings – so I tend to have a nosey around now and then.  And whilst we all blog, talk and generally pontificate about writing content that’s worth linking to etc.  It seems to be the case that content literally still is king.

But not really in the way I’d hope.

Continue reading

Why SEOs should stop link-building

Because your PR team are probably doing something right now that could be more valuable.

Honestly, everytime I read an article on link building techniques or a link buidling tutorial I can’t help but think about the last time I spoke with our PR guru.  He’s a talented and animated chap with an excellent eye for a scoop, angle or generally a reason for people to talk about us.

Broadly, link-building for SEO is the same principal.  The methods by which one ensures a company has a positive footprint in the broader world, map almost precisely onto the best ways to ensure a website has the same.

Continue reading

Social Network? More like Social Not-work

Very simply – Social media as a concept is muddied and amorphous. Obviously, we’ve already seen a stampede of hip advertisers and cynical brands into those spaces; testing ‘messages’, ad models, cut through and viral activity.

As with every other media channel, barriers to entry creep lower and lower allowing far too many people to assume they ‘get’ social media – I look out across this wasteland of faceless corporate profiles and think.

We’re doing it wrong.

Continue reading

SEO and PPC skillsets: A further fun-alysis

Image courtesy of Flickr - wwworks
Image courtesy of Flickr - wwworks

I really enjoyed a post by Kate Morris on New Edge Media regarding the skillsets of PPC and SEO Managers, where they meet and where they differ.

I won’t go over that again but it did get me wistfully thinking about how much fun I’ve had acquiring these skills and sent me off on a jaunt along memory lane, reminiscing about the early days of search and being part (or sometimes all!) of a growing, learning search department.

Many of us’ll remember evolving from the small one-win-at-a-time initiatives, to the infusion Continue reading

Pagination with javascript for SEO, elegant or wrong?

One of the challenges facing enterprise-level SEO is the general specification for large sites.

By that I mean rules to make sure we’re not wasting links by needlessly diluting the authority they bring; or contradicting the content focus that made our site and its structure profoundly relevant from the start.

One that cropped up recently was pagination of articles, I’ll cover search result pagination in a later post.

Contradictory opinions on how best to paginate articles are common, specifically with SEO in mind.  As we know there are loads of different approaches to how content websites manage pagination, but different business units have vastly discint best-case scenarios, meaning it’s normally a case of compromise. Usually between commercial, editorial and digital marketing/SEO.

Is there a way to consistently paginate that keeps all parties happy? Continue reading